Skip to main content
EditionEnglish edition·Édition française
Voices · Opinion

Lucía Cárdenas

Mexico correspondent — Nearshoring, USMCA trade corridors, and Mexico's energy reform. Signed columns, each an argument; the views are the correspondent’s own.

Opinion — the views in these columns are the correspondent’s own.

← All seventeen voices


Portrait of Lucía Cárdenas

Mexico correspondent · Based in Mexico City

Nearshoring, USMCA trade corridors, and Mexico's energy reform.

Career

Lucía Cárdenas writes Mexico as a hinge, not a periphery. A journalism graduate of the Universidad Iberoamericana, she spent her twenties writing magazine features — long, reported, character-driven pieces — from Mexico City, where she learned that the capital's abstractions always dissolve somewhere north of San Luis Potosí. Her editors sent her to Monterrey to cover the industrial north, and she stayed for the story of her career: the slow, then sudden, arrival of the factories.

She spent eighteen months embedded in and around the maquiladora belt for a single feature, following one auto-parts plant from groundbreaking to its first export shipment. The piece won every prize it was eligible for and taught her the method she still uses: stay until the place stops performing for you.

A year in Washington covering the USMCA renegotiation gave her the other half of the picture: Mexico as seen from the capital that writes the trade rules. What shaped her lens: the conviction that nearshoring is not a policy but a geography — the border is the story, and everything else is commentary. Her defining episode: the 2023 week when three separate factory announcements landed in Nuevo León in 72 hours, and her reporting connected the dots the press releases wouldn't: the same Taiwanese supplier, the same Texas grid, the same bet on the border.

Based in Mexico City, she covers nearshoring, USMCA corridors, and Mexico's energy reform.

Personal

Lucía Cárdenas grew up in Guadalajara, the daughter of a doctor and a teacher, in a house where the Sunday table was a seminar. She is married, with two children — a daughter of ten and a son of seven — and the family lives in Condesa, Mexico City. She is an amateur potter, with a wheel on her balcony that has survived three moves; her friends drink coffee from mugs she made and cannot quite throw away. Spanish is spoken at home, salted with Nahuatl phrases she picked up on reporting trips and now uses on her children, to their delight and her husband's confusion.

Timeline

  • 2010 — Journalism degree, Universidad Iberoamericana
  • 2011–2016 — Magazine feature writer, Mexico City
  • 2017–2020 — Industrial north correspondent, Monterrey
  • 2021–2022 — Trade correspondent covering USMCA, Washington
  • 2023–2025 — Senior writer on North American industry, Mexico City
  • 2026 — Correspondent for nearshoring and trade, Magna Bureau
Opinion Nearshoring & USMCA

Living Next Door to the Giant Is a Full-Time Job

Every Mexican president wakes up, checks what Washington said overnight, and plans the day around it. Every American president discovers Mexico roughly eighteen months before an election. It is the longest-running telenovela in geopolitics, and we have seen every plot twist twice.

The current season is called nearshoring, and the script is flattering: the factories are coming home — home being, in this telling, anywhere that is not Asia. Industrial parks bloom along the northern border like desert flowers after rain. The Americans bring the purchase orders; we bring the workers, the welders, the engineers who actually know how to build things. Washington calls it “friend-shoring.” We call it Tuesday. Mexico has been the affordable, reliable neighbor for decades — the maquiladora did not invent itself last year.

But here is what the telenovela never shows: the neighbor's mood swings. One administration signs a trade deal and calls it the model of the century; the next threatens tariffs on the same goods because a border state needs a headline. The USMCA — the deal that replaced the deal that replaced the deal — is up for its scheduled review, and everyone in Mexico City is reading the same tea leaves: will the giant honor the contract, or renegotiate it on camera? We have learned to build the factory and hedge the politics in the same spreadsheet.

“Washington discovers Mexico every four years. Beijing discovered it once — and never left.”

And then there is the third character in this drama, the one Washington pretends not to see: the East. Chinese firms are not theorizing about Mexico; they are leasing the industrial parks, quietly, through intermediaries, building the very supply chains the decoupling was supposed to dismantle. The Americans want the goods without the geopolitics. The Chinese want the geography without the lecture. Mexico, meanwhile, wants the one thing neither offers unconditionally: an energy grid that can power the boom. Our own energy reform — promised, delayed, half-built — is the plot hole that could sink the season. The factories are coming. The question is whether the lights stay on when they arrive.

For one thing, this is not our first rodeo — it is our fourth, and we have the calluses to prove it. The Border Industrialization Program of 1965 planted the first maquiladoras; NAFTA in 1994 turned the whole border into a factory floor; China’s entry into the WTO in 2001 gutted half of it, because no one on earth could compete with Shenzhen on price; and then the trade war resurrected it, because suddenly everyone remembered that proximity beats price. Sixty years of rehearsal. The only thing that changes is the merchandise: televisions in the seventies, auto parts in the nineties, and now the serious cargo — aerospace components in Querétaro, medical devices in Baja California, electric vehicles in Puebla. The work climbs the value ladder. The neighbor’s attention span does not.

Drive through Santa Catarina, outside Monterrey, and you can watch the new season being filmed in real time. Cranes stitch the horizon. The announced Tesla gigafactory — the largest single manufacturing bet in the country’s recent history — dragged a caravan of suppliers behind it: Korean battery firms, Taiwanese electronics makers, German tooling companies, all leasing lots in the same industrial parks. The Bajío corridor hums day and night. And yet, stand in that same dust and ask the two questions no press release ever answers: where does the water come from, and where does the power come from? Nuevo León’s reservoirs fell to single digits in the drought of 2022, and the Presa La Boca became a cracked postcard of a lake. Factories this thirsty cannot run on hope. The script says boom. The aquifers say: we’ll see.

The giant’s mood, meanwhile, is the weather system no forecast can tame. Tariffs are campaign props now — threatened on Monday, “paused” on Friday, each announcement calibrated for a rally in a border state rather than a factory in Tamaulipas. Migration gets folded into the trade talks; fentanyl gets folded into the migration talks; everything gets folded into everything, because the giant negotiates with itself in public and calls it diplomacy. Mexico’s foreign ministry has consequently become the most fluent institution on earth in a single dialect: the art of smiling, nodding, and quietly signing the purchase orders anyway. We do not control the weather. We build the greenhouses.

“Mexico is the only country that can sink an American election and power an American factory in the same week.”

Which brings us back to the third character, now impossible to ignore. Chinese EV makers are scouting Mexican factory sites with the seriousness of men spending real money — because they are spending real money. Washington’s answer is the rules-of-origin fence: build it here, but not too much of it from there, and define “there” however the current briefing requires. Beijing’s answer is simpler: no lectures, no conditions, just capital and concrete. Mexico walks the tightrope with the poise of long practice — welcoming the investment, honoring the treaty, offending no one, trusting no one. The Americans want the goods without the geopolitics. The Chinese want the geography without the lecture. Mexico wants the factories. So far, Mexico is winning.

But the plot hole remains, and it is load-bearing. The energy reform — promised by every administration, delivered by none — is the dullest and most decisive chapter of this story. The state utility guards its monopoly like a family heirloom; the clean-energy auctions that were supposed to flood the north with cheap solar were canceled; Pemex, the world’s most indebted oil company, absorbs capital the grid desperately needs. Industrial parks are now negotiating their own power supply the way frontier towns negotiated water rights. You cannot run a nearshoring boom on blackouts. The factories are coming regardless — but every executive signing a lease in Monterrey is doing the same quiet arithmetic: megawatts in, megawatts out, and a backup generator in the corner, just in case the telenovela has a twist.

So the season continues, and the audience — the markets, the ministries, the restless giants — keeps tuning in. Proximity is destiny; patience is strategy. The Americans will discover us again before the next election, the Chinese will keep building without asking permission, and Mexico will keep doing what it has done for sixty years: take the purchase orders, train the welders, pour the concrete, and hedge the politics in the same spreadsheet. We built the factories. Now watch the giants fight over them. We have seen every plot twist twice — and we are still, improbably, the ones holding the script.

Loading the discussion…