Skip to main content
EditionEnglish edition·Édition française
Voices · Opinion

Kaveh Hosseini

Iran correspondent — Oil and gas under sanctions, regional security, and nuclear diplomacy. Signed columns, each an argument; the views are the correspondent’s own.

Opinion — the views in these columns are the correspondent’s own.

← All seventeen voices


Portrait of Kaveh Hosseini

Iran correspondent · Based in Tehran

Oil and gas under sanctions, regional security, and nuclear diplomacy.

Career

Kaveh Hosseini has been reporting on oil and diplomacy since before some of his colleagues were born. An engineering graduate of the University of Tehran, he began his career in the early 1990s writing about the petroleum industry for the Iranian press, and stayed with the two subjects — energy and statecraft — through sanctions, negotiations, breakdowns, and negotiations again. Three decades on, almost no one has covered the Iranian oil story longer.

His datelines trace the geography of the file: Tehran, where the policy is made; Vienna, where he sat through the long nuclear negotiations of 2014–2015, filing the nightly dispatches that explained what the communiqués were not saying; Beirut, where he covered the regional security architecture that oil money underwrites. He has interviewed ministers in four capitals and traders in half a dozen ports, all with the same skeptical courtesy.

What shaped his lens: sanctions as weather. Hosseini argues that sanctions are not an event but a climate — they reshape everything they touch — and that anyone who reports on Iran as a series of crises will always miss the story. His defining episode: the night in July 2015 when the nuclear deal was announced in Vienna, and he filed not the celebration but the warning — that oil would flow again, but trust would take a generation. He was right about both.

Based in Tehran, he covers oil and gas under sanctions, regional security, and nuclear diplomacy.

Personal

Kaveh Hosseini grew up in Tabriz, the son of a bazaar merchant and a homemaker, above the shop where he learned arithmetic counting change. He has been married for thirty years; they have three grown daughters and are now grandparents of two. The family lives in Tehran, in the same neighborhood where they raised their children. In the evenings he plays the setar, an old instrument with a new string every few years. Azeri Turkish and Persian are both spoken at home — Azeri for the heart, he says, Persian for the headlines.

Timeline

  • 1994 — Engineering degree, University of Tehran
  • 1994–2005 — Energy reporter, Iranian press, Tehran
  • 2006–2013 — Diplomatic correspondent covering oil and sanctions, Tehran
  • 2014–2015 — Nuclear-talks correspondent, Vienna
  • 2016–2024 — Regional security and energy columnist, Beirut and Tehran
  • 2026 — Correspondent for energy and diplomacy, Magna Bureau
Opinion Oil under sanctions & nuclear diplomacy

Three Thousand Years of Empire Changes How You Read the News

Persia has watched empires come and go — the Greeks, the Arabs, the Mongols, the British — the way a mountain watches weather. When you have three thousand years of statecraft behind you, a sanctions regime is not an existential crisis. It is a season.

This is the thing the sanctions architects never quite grasp: pressure assumes the target has no memory. Iran has nothing but memory. The oil still flows — through other ports, under other flags, at the discount the market demands and the buyers accept. The “maximum pressure” of one decade becomes the quiet accommodation of the next, because the world still needs the barrels and the barrels still exist. We learned to refine, to smuggle, to build, to wait. As our poets have always known: the reed bends, and the wind passes.

And the deals! Every few years, a new American administration discovers diplomacy, and the diplomats fly to Vienna or Muscat or Geneva with the earnest faces of men who believe history began with their briefing book. The Europeans come promising trade; the Russians come promising solidarity; the Chinese come promising purchases — at a discount, naturally, for the risk. Each is weighed. Each is found, in the Persian manner, to be pursuing exactly its own interest, which is the one honest thing about the whole proceedings.

“The reed bends, and the wind passes. We have outlasted every wind so far.”

Do not mistake this for complacency. The sanctions bite — the currency, the medicine shortages, the young engineers who leave. The cost is real and it is paid by ordinary people, which is the part the architects in Washington never put in the press release. But the strategic lesson stands, and it is the one the whole Global South is now studying: a determined state, with resources the world needs, can be squeezed but not broken. The mountain does not move. It simply waits for the weather to change — and the weather, as three thousand years have taught us, always changes.

For the pattern is older than the Islamic Republic, older than the sanctions offices, older than most of the diplomats now managing it. In 1953, Mohammad Mossadegh nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company at Abadan — the largest refinery on earth — and Britain answered with an embargo, a blockade, and eventually a coup. The script was written then: the oil weaponized, the lawyers mobilized, the Persians blamed for owning their own geology. Washington and London have been sanctioning Iranian oil since before most of their current officials were born. Every “unprecedented” measure arrives with a precedent, filed in our archives, in triplicate.

The modern machine, it must be admitted, is a marvel of bureaucratic warfare: secondary sanctions that punish third countries for buying, the SWIFT expulsions of 2012 and 2018 that severed the banks, the sanctions lists that grow like ivy. It is the most sophisticated financial siege ever constructed — correspondent banking turned into a weapon, the dollar’s plumbing into a leash. And the barrels still move. Because the siege assumes the besieged will behave like a spreadsheet, and Persia behaves like a bazaar: infinitely patient, endlessly inventive, and fluent in every currency of evasion ever minted.

Consider the how, since the architects so rarely do. The ghost fleet: tankers with painted-over names and fresh flags, transponders going dark in the Gulf of Oman, ship-to-ship transfers conducted off Malaysia under moonless skies, the crude rebranded as someone else’s blend by the time it reaches the refinery. The true sanctions-buster is not a general but a merchant — the bazaar has been trading around blockades for a thousand years, and the blockade is merely the newest customer. Every chokepoint the West seals, the bazaar routes around; every certificate demanded, the bazaar forges, files, or finds unnecessary. The paperwork of empire meets the improvisation of the souk. The souk is winning.

And the buyers? They queue politely. China’s independent “teapot” refineries absorb the discounted barrels with industrial cheerfulness; the sanctions discount — the market’s quiet confession that morality has a price — is priced into every cargo. Petrochemicals, harder to trace and harder to sanction than crude, flow as the quieter revenue stream. Settlement happens in yuan, in barter, in patience. The East does not lecture about the purchases; the East makes them. Everyone’s principles, it turns out, are negotiable at the right discount — except, of course, the principles printed in the press releases.

“A siege is only a siege if the city runs out of memory. Persia has never run out of memory.”

Then there is the nuclear file — the program as leverage and liability, the chip that is never quite played and never quite folded. The JCPOA’s brief spring of 2015 proved that a deal was possible; the American withdrawal of 2018 proved that a deal was reversible; the years since have proved that reversibility is itself a negotiating position. Vienna’s revolving diplomats arrive with briefing books and depart with homework, each administration discovering diplomacy the way tourists discover Persepolis — briefly, earnestly, and mostly for the photographs. Tehran, meanwhile, enriches the one asset no sanctions can seize: time.

And behind every negotiation sits the unspoken card: Hormuz. A fifth of the world’s seaborne oil passes through that narrow strait, and everyone at the table knows it, and no one at the table mentions it — the politeness of mutually assured inconvenience. The strait has never been closed and never needs to be; the art of the implied threat, perfected over three millennia of statecraft, requires only that the option exist and the mountain remain visible. The mountain does not need to move to be feared. It only needs to be there, watching the weather.

The cost, though — let us not romanticize the mountain. The rial’s long fall has taxed every household; the medicine shortages, the cruelest line item, punish the sick for the sins of the statecraft; and the engineers of Sharif University — among the finest technical minds on earth — now write code in Toronto and Berlin, the sanctions’ most elegant export. The brain drain is the siege’s quietest victory, and it is real. Nevertheless the universities graduate them by the thousand, because Persia has always made scholars the way other countries make steel, and no sanctions regime in history has managed to embargo a civilization’s habit of thinking.

So the seasons turn, as they always do. The sanctions architects will draft new measures with new acronyms; the diplomats will discover diplomacy again before the next election; the tankers will darken their transponders and sail on; the bazaar will route around whatever is built. The reed bends, and the wind passes. We have outlasted every wind so far — the Greeks, the Arabs, the Mongols, the British, and the briefing books. The mountain does not move. It simply waits for the weather to change. And the weather, as three thousand years have taught us, always changes.

Loading the discussion…